Today’s blog it is about the socialization, what we learn to be? What the
agents of socialization teach us?
The way in which a child is raised have a
lot of influence on the lifestyle the person will once live. Values, beliefs,
knowledge, language, behaviors and common etiquette's are all passes on from
generation to generation. A result of good values and mores to a child may
result in a successful lifestyle, possible filled with expensive material
objects. However, Terri D. Heath is not concerned with these results. In his
article, “parents socialization of children” the concentration is more on
personal feelings a child has, as he grows into an adult. In other words, Heath
believes that a good influence on a child will give them good self esteem, a
happier outlook, and the ability to be social. The point Heath is trying to get
across is that parents do affect children heavily, especially in their formative
years. Parents are a powerful influence, and with a good foundation children
can live a satisfying life. Through many examples Heath shows worldwide proof
that parents are the ones that influence their children’s life. Some of the
examples are quite interesting because different international societies are
represented and it seems that there are more similarities than differences in
parents’ socialization of children across cultures. “This discussion of
parental socialization techniques describes and illustrates how the balance and
interaction of parental control, power, and support result in particular child
behaviors. Although Chinese parents spend little time each week with their
young children, they serve as powerful socialization agents in the development
of their children’s personalities.” Also “although much speculation exists
about why minority populations are over-represented in reports of child
maltreatment in the United States, it is apparently not because corporal punishment
is a preferred method of parental control for either native-born or foreign-born
Mexican Americans. Finally, parental support of particular child behaviors
encourages the development of what Israeli mothers describe as autonomy and
Japanese mothers describe as obedience.”
I belief that an involved parent is not one
who spends the majority of the day near his/her child but rarely interacting
with the child but those who uses opportunities to share activities such as
teaching, reading together or even playing; that supportive relationship will
have greater expectations of the children’s behavior and the children will demonstrate
better outcome!
Woman
are being told that they place is in the house, being a caregiver, and that
they are better and faster than man in doing all the chores of the house. The article
“retro wife” by Lisa Miller talks about a woman who had a nice career but at
the end she give up because she decided to give her children’s all the
attention that they will need of a mother. While she is at home that father is
working and providing for them. That's why is called retro because is a woman
that lives in the 21 century but her beliefs are similar to the woman of the
past. It is true that it can be a dream when there are two people shearing the responsibility
of being parents! But we leave in a society where that responsibility of two is
rarely seems, where a woman have to be the two roles: mother and father,
working and doing the chores of the house. We are being socialized that the man
can’t have the two roles because they are not good as a woman in the house but there
exists men that indeed are father and mother but the society seems them as guy!This is when the stereotype comes in ranking people for how they look and how
they act.
My
mother is an example of the article “retro wife’ even my grandmother but the
difference between my mother and my grandmother is that my mother after all her
3 children were bigger enough to go to school by themselves she went back to
work, living us with my father because he already was retire from work. The roles
were invert but both were there supporting us and teaching how to behave!
We
watch two videos one is called “A call to men” and the other one “killing us
softly.” The video “A call to men” by Tony Porter, is about how the men are
socialized in our society. Socialization is the process through which
people learn their cultures basic norms, values and behaviors. Porter emphasizes
that “men has to be strong, can’t show emotions with the exception of anger,
that are to supposed to lead and being fallow, that men are superior and woman
inferior and that woman are objects specially sexual objects.” Men still very
rigidly socialized to repress all kind of human qualities in them self, incapable
to show feelings. This socialization consists in “a man box” as Porter explains
this man box is teaching how to build a man, to fallow those guides if they
want to be a real men. Some of the examples are:
- - Do not show weakness or fear
- - Do not cry or openly express emotions
- - Do not be “like a woman”
The
value and norms passed from father to son is never getting out of that box if
you want to continue being a man. Many have fear of getting out, they fear that
the society will not accept them if they do not fallow those norms. Tony Porter
talks about his own experiences when his pride of men was more important than
to help a girl that probably needed someone help emphasizing that it didn't matter
what could happen to that girl because the most important thing was to make the others belief that he just had relations with the girl and that it was good. He shows
an equation: less value + property + objectification = violence
against woman arguing that those are the reasons why there is violence in
this world against the woman. At the end of the video Porter said that it is
okay not being dominating, that it is okay having feelings and emotions and that
it is okay to promote equality.
The video “killing us softly” by Jean Kilbourne
is about the image and descriptions of the woman in the media. Kilbourne emphasizes
that “advertising tell us who we are and who we should be, tell us that the
most important is how we look, surrounding us of image of absolutely beauty”
woman from early ages learn that they have to spend a lot of time and energy
trying to achieve perfection and felling guilty because they fail but failure
is inevitable because no one can be perfect. She argues that we live in a time
where a woman becomes real objects such as the bottle of a beer; woman body is
turn into things! Turning a human being into a thing is the first step to justify
violence, the person is being dehumanize and that message that it is given to young girls is that they
have to be impossible cute, extremely sexy, extremely thin and that they will
fail because is impossible.
Many girls idealized themselves just like
those girls that the media show to us telling them self: if they are like that
why I can’t be like them or if she have that why I can’t have it; those girls spend
most of their time trying to be like them and wanting all that they have just
because the media show to us that it is right, but is it? I don’t think so many
girls have eating disorders or even died just because they tried to become “perfect”
just as the media tell us. The power of the media is being hegemony,
making the people believe their perspective, making people believe that it is
right.
Those
two video relates to the chapter 5 “power” and chapter 6 “socialization”. In the video “A call to men” the power it
seems on how men are being socialized, they learn that they are the strongest
one that one that rules, that one that had to be fallow that one who has the
power. Many cultures indeed are formed by a patriarchy government; an
example is the United States government which is ruled by a man not a woman! Also we can see the matrix of domination
between man and woman. The woman is the fragile one, that weak one but men are
the strongest one. We still see inequality of gender no matter how hard
a woman tried to be like men they will never be accepted as one in the society,
an example of this is a men and a woman can have the same job but who will gain
more money? Of course the men!
In
the video “killing us softly” we can see how the power tactics are being
used as method to control the people through the media. The media make us beliefs
that we need to be just like those unreal people. The woman is being used by
the media as an object, as an extremely sexy and thin object! Men are used by
the media but always they are the one who have the power, the one who mistreat
the woman. So if the media promote that it’s okay to hit a woman then it is
okay to do it?










